is the sky falling? Remember Netware?

The upper floor at the Guardian technology is currently rumors of Google to get rid of Windows. Apparently, Google Dell studio 1537 Battery is moving its employees to use a Mac or Linux.

Why is it interesting Hewlett Packard ac adapter? I think because the world is now looking for evidence that Microsoft has not succeeded. Microsoft Mobile omission of this one, but not in his heart of desktop operating systems even more interesting. Assuming that Google itself, Google ?úgone, Au, is also a reminder that after the release of your organization's Office and Outlook and Exchange, it also allows you to switch to Windows on the desktop. A side effect of clouds of various local operating system.

Most companies still run Windows, as far as I can tell. Microsoft Platform AOS, very wide. I had a conversation with the Windows Embedded team has recently developed service and Digital Signage, interesting things, and invisible to most of us.

Thus, the sky is not falling yet. However, if the public perception of Microsoft, however, that should not be with the new models of computers, which in itself is a serious problem.

I have not forgotten the history Dell studio 1735 Battery of Novell. Back in the nineties, everyone knew that Windows NT is moving Novell Netware OSA. At the same time, everyone knew that the superiority in many respects, Netware, Windows NT was: the catalog was more advanced, the service was simple, reliable, the better. Here, SOA Blog 1999 Nick Holland's why:

The general impression that the industry is Novell "has beens". Microsoft Windows NT, where everything goes.

I've often people ask me if they should switch to NT, and I ask them why they think they are. Answer: "Well, ISN, ALO everyone else?" Answer: 1) the arena, she AOT 2) even if, as is the mandate that you have.?

The Netherlands continues to assert that Netware is still widely used as Windows, and explain in detail why he prefers to establish and maintain Netware. There was a guy Netware defense of his choice, but reading his diatribe, ten years later, not AOS agree not to work with its technical assessment.

So why is Windows NT, to get the market relative to other established and better? There were several factors. Windows has already won on the client, and Microsoft makes it better to integrate it into its own directory and the server. Secondly, the leaders liked the idea of using the same platform for both client and server can not blame the other guy. Third, if an understanding that everyone must continue to move to Windows NT, it was a "self-fulfilling. Ultimately, the perception of the most important thing.

Today, the perception of work for Microsoft. Windows Mobile platform is reduced. Internet Explorer is losing market share. Microsoft played the agony of working for years on Tablet PC and Origami (HP DV6000 Adapter), only Apple makes it easy to IPAD, has its first launch in this market.

Microsoft does AA Brandon LeBlanc, Financial Times said the problem:

Windows is more susceptible to attacks by hackers and are susceptible to viruses than other operating systems, as is well known.

I, ALO Microsoft's efforts on security issues in a number of years, doubt, and makes some valid points Leblanc. Nevertheless, I suspect the general reader will agree that the said FT. They are more common malware damaged or friends on a machine Windows, which affected Mac or Linux (if you know someone with Linux). This applies to more than a lot of spin on the security enhancements in Windows.